[freedom and autonomy in test of pandemia: When protecting leads to locked down (1) and when release leads to monitor (2)].
Identifieur interne : 000076 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000075; suivant : 000077[freedom and autonomy in test of pandemia: When protecting leads to locked down (1) and when release leads to monitor (2)].
Auteurs : Patrick CalvasSource :
- Ethique & sante [ 1765-4629 ] ; 2020.
Abstract
In France, the COVID 19 epidemic period led from 16 March to 11 May 2020 to restrict the right of movement of individuals. In order to respect democratic procedures, a state of health emergency was declared, allowing transitional laws to be introduced under the control of parliament. Regardless of their health effectiveness in the spread of the virus, these measures revealed very restrictive situations for residents of medical and social institutions, especially elderly. Paradoxically, among the procedures designed to release lockdown of the population, electronic surveillance solutions have been put forward without even debating their attendant constraints and risks. These two aspects of the health crisis that are briefly related here.
DOI: 10.1016/j.etiqe.2020.08.004
PubMed: 32922526
PubMed Central: PMC7473335
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">[freedom and autonomy in test of pandemia: When protecting leads to locked down (1) and when release leads to monitor (2)].</title><author><name sortKey="Calvas, Patrick" sort="Calvas, Patrick" uniqKey="Calvas P" first="Patrick" last="Calvas">Patrick Calvas</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>PU-PH Service de Génétique Médicale, CHU de Toulouse, Université de Toulouse Chargé de Mission à l'Espace de Réflexion Ethique Régional-Occitanie (ERE-Occitanie).</nlm:affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">Université de Toulouse Chargé de Mission à l'Espace de Réflexion Ethique Régional-Occitanie (ERE-Occitanie)</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2020">2020</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:32922526</idno><idno type="pmid">32922526</idno><idno type="doi">10.1016/j.etiqe.2020.08.004</idno><idno type="pmc">PMC7473335</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">000137</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000137</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000137</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">000137</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000137</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">[freedom and autonomy in test of pandemia: When protecting leads to locked down (1) and when release leads to monitor (2)].</title><author><name sortKey="Calvas, Patrick" sort="Calvas, Patrick" uniqKey="Calvas P" first="Patrick" last="Calvas">Patrick Calvas</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>PU-PH Service de Génétique Médicale, CHU de Toulouse, Université de Toulouse Chargé de Mission à l'Espace de Réflexion Ethique Régional-Occitanie (ERE-Occitanie).</nlm:affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">Université de Toulouse Chargé de Mission à l'Espace de Réflexion Ethique Régional-Occitanie (ERE-Occitanie)</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Ethique & sante</title><idno type="ISSN">1765-4629</idno><imprint><date when="2020" type="published">2020</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">In France, the COVID 19 epidemic period led from 16 March to 11 May 2020 to restrict the right of movement of individuals. In order to respect democratic procedures, a state of health emergency was declared, allowing transitional laws to be introduced under the control of parliament. Regardless of their health effectiveness in the spread of the virus, these measures revealed very restrictive situations for residents of medical and social institutions, especially elderly. Paradoxically, among the procedures designed to release lockdown of the population, electronic surveillance solutions have been put forward without even debating their attendant constraints and risks. These two aspects of the health crisis that are briefly related here.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="Publisher" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">32922526</PMID><DateRevised><Year>2020</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>14</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">1765-4629</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><PubDate><Year>2020</Year><Month>Sep</Month><Day>04</Day></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Ethique & sante</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Ethique Sante</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>[freedom and autonomy in test of pandemia: When protecting leads to locked down (1) and when release leads to monitor (2)].</ArticleTitle><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1016/j.etiqe.2020.08.004</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>In France, the COVID 19 epidemic period led from 16 March to 11 May 2020 to restrict the right of movement of individuals. In order to respect democratic procedures, a state of health emergency was declared, allowing transitional laws to be introduced under the control of parliament. Regardless of their health effectiveness in the spread of the virus, these measures revealed very restrictive situations for residents of medical and social institutions, especially elderly. Paradoxically, among the procedures designed to release lockdown of the population, electronic surveillance solutions have been put forward without even debating their attendant constraints and risks. These two aspects of the health crisis that are briefly related here.</AbstractText><CopyrightInformation>© 2020 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.</CopyrightInformation></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Calvas</LastName><ForeName>Patrick</ForeName><Initials>P</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>PU-PH Service de Génétique Médicale, CHU de Toulouse, Université de Toulouse Chargé de Mission à l'Espace de Réflexion Ethique Régional-Occitanie (ERE-Occitanie).</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>fre</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D004740">English Abstract</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><VernacularTitle>Liberté et autonomie à l’épreuve de la pandémie: Quand protéger conduit à confiner (1) et quand libérer conduit à surveiller (2).</VernacularTitle><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2020</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>04</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>France</Country><MedlineTA>Ethique Sante</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>9885754</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1765-4629</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Autonomy</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">COVID 19</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Epidemic</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Freedom</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Health policy</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2020</Year><Month>07</Month><Day>16</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="revised"><Year>2020</Year><Month>08</Month><Day>28</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2020</Year><Month>08</Month><Day>28</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2020</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>14</Day><Hour>5</Hour><Minute>51</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2020</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>15</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2020</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>15</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>aheadofprint</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">32922526</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1016/j.etiqe.2020.08.004</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">S1765-4629(20)30104-5</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC7473335</ArticleId></ArticleIdList><pmc-dir>pmcsd</pmc-dir>
</PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Calvas, Patrick" sort="Calvas, Patrick" uniqKey="Calvas P" first="Patrick" last="Calvas">Patrick Calvas</name></noCountry></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/CovidFranceV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000076 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000076 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Sante
|area= CovidFranceV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:32922526
|texte= [freedom and autonomy in test of pandemia: When protecting leads to locked down (1) and when release leads to monitor (2)].
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:32922526" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a CovidFranceV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37. |  |